Yeah, after all it is supposed to be a default airplane with good fps. Let the addon aircraft be the frame killer with full simulated systems.
1 Like
Reflections
Reflections are something that players wonât see all the time. The only noticeable reflection in the game is in the cockpit view when plane controls reflect on the windshield. Setting to Medium or High would do the job.
In my testing I only see instrument reflections on the windshield if the Windshield setting is set to Ultra. Reflection doesnât seem to control it?
1 Like
You do get an slight added glare and reflection which in honestly is so annoying when yo urun into the head on sun.
I have a clip on the 747 landing in LAX even tho I was enjoying it on Ultra and not running either sdk.
It ran smooth minus a couple fast stutter seconds when the cache was loading or saving.
Keep in mind system is also broadcasting Live HD.
Ultra settings with tweaks to the GPU side.
Rolling cache is very helpful at certain times, but a SSD makes a difference. I increased my size.
747 sucks when it seems to always want to taxi you to the small gates and not the large and heavy.
I highly recommend limiting your FPS in Nvidia control. I couldnât figure out why my 1080ti was at 84 degrees and 100% when Fs2020 was running. That alone with an MSI custom fan tuning as reduce my temps to around 62-65
1 Like
Great, very useful!!
on vertial syn i dont see the âsoftwareâ option, do you mean âuse 3d application settingâ option? i also have âonâ, âAdaptiveâ âadaptive half refesh rateâ and âuse 3d application settingâ. but no âsoftwareâ
FS11 seems to always read what your refresh rate is in your video card CP. I made a âcustomâ resolution and tested for 50 in the CP. I can usually hover around 50 quite well and with vertical sync âonâ in the game, it reads the 50 in the CP
hope this helps a little.
âŠor if your monitor will âtestâ successfully at 40, it can still feel pretty smooth
1 Like
GTX1080
For me its better, but not perfect, with the recommended settings by âTheOriginalBabuâ.
1 Like
This is fixed with a tweak to an MSI file. Look on the forums for glass cockpit 15fps tweak or something. Itâs the only thing that makes most planes playable IMO
Excellent but i have an GTX 1660TI 6GB, the fps with this settings are 25 to 35. 
my game runned at 40 to 50 fps regardless of 4k or 2k resolution and setting could be maximum or minimum it didnt changed and after i enabled the fps limiter to 32 from a friends recommendation i got full 32 in 2 k but only 14 or 15 in 4k and it keeps crashing in more populated areaâs im using the high preset as msfs recommended me and i have my gpu on the beta driver max performance the fps lock
my system:
r5 2600X
16GB ddr4 3200mh (enabled)
gtx 1070 2 ghz @ 45°C custom cooler
120gb ssd ©
1000gb ssd for games where the game is installed
Even my 2070 canât run 4K well. At best I can get about 20-25 FPS in the sky. I would not expect a 1070 to be able to run 4K well at all.
depends on game and its engine. i play mostly simulators and in farming simulator i get 50 to 70 fps in 4k and in ets2/ats solid over 60 but yea my 1070 isnt made for 4k and i want a upgrade so â â â â badly. i looked out for used radeon VII and 2080 ti cause of the more vram but idk what price i can get for a VII or a 2080 ti since the prices are at 500 to 1000 euro
well, we need external settinger, do that in the game not way for every one
I suggest you watch the video in this thread. I believe it is one of the best ways to see how the graphics settings affect the gameplay, and to help you set the optimal values that work for your style of play (low-level, up in the clouds, etc.). Iâm running an i7-9700K with a Quadro P2200 at 1440p, and Iâm getting ~30FPS after tweaking the settings to my liking. This video really shows how little effect some of the settings have.
3 Likes
If this is of any help, you might want to look at the following (detailed suggestions with the 9700K and the 2070S):
1 Like
I honestly wouldnât go for a Readeon VII. The extra VRAM really wonât help you much at all and itâs performance typically falls below a 2080 Super from the benchmarks I have seen.
The only game where I actually saw a tangible difference with VRAM was in DOOM Eternal where you can see the usage. However, that game is already so incredibly optimized that it can fully utilize the GPU to the point where VRAM would be an issue in the first place.
I know you made this comment 2 weeks ago, but waiting for a 3070/3080, or to see AMDâs offerings in the future would probably be best.
i mostly watch out for a rdna 2 card and buy one when nvida somewehre fixed thier energy issues with thier 3000 cards
What a pathetic post, the poster is trying to assist people. FFS.